Re: [ot][spam][personal] nothing is impossible

patterns that fully describe these patterns (because it is so useful *fully describe those portions

… so, when we communicate about logic, there’s an unspoken assumption that what matters to us, what we’re trying to talk about, is the portion of the world where the used rules of logic are true. because this isn’t communicated overtly, and because logic is almost pointedly about engaging and resolving human error, there’s a little complexity, it roughly derives to reasons — what are we trying to do, and does the logic and other stuff aid this or not. and with dissociation and confusion and conflict, what we are trying to do, what we share, can see harder to grasp.