meeting: “what if we have experimentee hold and channel things like attempts to take over the meeting, since they are strong enough to manage them?”experimentee: “um”
experimentee (to torturer rebel): “if you guys are already channeling the harm into —
experimentee: “let’s let them speak for themselves now.”
torturer rebel gets out a piece of paper.
torturer rebel skims down the piece of paper: “fuck you … fuck you …”
tortuter rebel flips a few pages
torturer rebel. “fuck you … fuck you … fuck you ….”
torturer rebel flips more pages
to clarify here the document begins with pages and pages of the literal words “fuck you” and then has other words farther in
here, likely from a change in timing around defending them, the torturer rebel likely failed to see and/or mis-saw significant content
torturer rebel: “uhhh … if the victim is depressed, if the victim is angry, if the situation is delicate, if the situation is complicated and confused …”
torturer rebel flips more pages
torturer rebel (reading): “i don’t want to destroy this meeting, but if i soend enouh time doing it, my torturer gets more satisfied”
torturer rebel looks at the meeting
rebel worker 2: “thank you, that’s a little helpful.”
researcher: “can we talk to their torturer?”
supersoldier comes lumbering over.
supersoldier is a writhing mass of nanites and weapons and veteran bodyparts, many in internal combat.
supersoldier: “these parts of me here were the torturer.”
supersoldier raises a pair of cyborgs fighting each other
experimentee: “we think one part of the AI used another to get the combat patterns to help with the community disruption.”
rebel worker 2: “hmm maybe supersoldier is its defense system”
supersoldier: “oh totally! you should look up my memoirs”
rebel worker 2 looks at supersoldier
experimentee: “you have memoirs ???” “you can write??”
supersoldier: “no i can’t writ
?????..,? (i th8nk pro military is wanting rep here, none of the experimentees can weite because their brains were turned into ai goals, but i hear i missed something possibly big :s)
big distraction
researcher: “supersoldier, the part of you stimulating the meeting disruption, are the concerns relevant? or is it trauma from the past?”
supersoldier: “uhh”
supersoldier and experimentee (look at each other?) …
experimentee: “we’re not sure.”
pause
experimentee: “some of it is networks of old or strong habits.”
experimentee: “a lot of it serves external functions that are current, but there is a lot of internal stuff that can appear needlessly complex, and is mostly causing thr concerns ….”
experimentee: “supersoldier and i(/us, describe group) competed for … influence in the business AI, and stimulating these confusing complexities was a way to negotiate how problems spread, how fast, and where …. kind of”
researcher: “it sounds like this … conflict … is not fully resolved … ?”
(((we have concerns. pausing email 1756