On 11/29/19 3:25 PM, coderman wrote:
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Friday, November 29, 2019 11:18 PM, Punk-Stasi 2.0 <
punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
> ...
>> yeah, I asked for 'sources' not controlled by the pentagon(mierdagon) and got reddit. Hilarious.
>
> quick, what they don't want you to see!
https://www.removeddit.com/r/all>
> (i must give Punk-Stasi 2.0 credit where due; on brand as never satisfied...)
>
>
> best regards,
>This is rich. From a 'talent management' site > "TIL a Harvard study
found that hiring one highly productive but toxic worker does more
damage to a company’s bottom line than employing several less productive
but more cooperative workers.Unoriginal Repost(tlnt.com)"
https://www.tlnt.com/toxic-workers-are-more-productive-but-the-price-is-high/Is there a definition of "toxic worker"? And is it possible to quantify how "toxic" a given worker is?
>It's more important to 'get along' than excel at the job. This describes
everything wrong with US industry today and is one of the reasons why
it's literally collapsing, but it's good for the billionaires.
Rr