On Nov 10, 2016, at 6:51 PM, Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 06:16:33PM -0300, Juan wrote: On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:30:30 -0500 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Razer <rayzer@riseup.net> wrote: So the final numbers for Election Day are:
231,556,622 eligible voters
46.9% didn't vote 25.6% voted Clinton 25.5% voted Trump
NOBODY got the most votes!
I'm ok with that... means there's plenty of room for someone representing and executing a different arrangement of ideas to get 25.7%.
I think the point is that "nobody" got the most votes so "nobody" should be president....
Also voting age is of course statist nonsense so the number of votes for "nobody" is even higher.
I want to marry my rock, and my rock wants to vote, it's an assisted rock, assisted by me, so I assist it to the voting booth, the only slight difficulty might be proving sentience, assuming such state ordered nonsense as "sentience" were set as the minimum bar for voting -though if it can be tested, I can prolly write a computer program for my robot to demonstrate sentience.
Sentience test??? That's voter disenfranchisement. Anyone dumb enough to think their vote means jack shit is barely sentient anyway.... =)
:)