(potential big mistakes/gaps/confusions around rw2+torturers story! also possibly left out “do you really now” sorry unsure and maybe “yes i do” but maybe not for obvious reason unsure maybe)<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">-</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">1628</div><div dir="auto">&gt; I want you (the front person or the higher-ups) to remember that you can</div><div dir="auto">&gt; dialogue with the parts who believe they have to return for any or all of these</div><div dir="auto">&gt; reasons. They need to understand that contact

with the group puts them in a</div><div dir="auto">&gt; weaker position and will lead to pain, while disconnection will protect them. For</div><div dir="auto">&gt; example, if a person returns to save someone else, he or she is often used to</div><div dir="auto">&gt; harm the person he or she was supposed to save, then accused of being a</div><div dir="auto">&gt; perpetrator, and told that disclosing what happened will result in the survivor</div><div dir="auto">&gt; being jailed. This is all a lie. The truth is that the group is less likely to harm</div><div dir="auto">&gt; someone you love if you are not present.</div><div dir="auto">we are guessing that not engaging shielded rooms is similar to return programming (ch9</div><div dir="auto">1630</div>