On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 01:03:05PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 07:27:26PM -0700, Razer wrote:
On 08/16/2017 05:32 PM, Umair Chachar wrote:
Joshua, I think you might've missed what Mike was trying to say. With mega corporate overlords taking over control of the internet, they can deny any unpopular speech from being put on the internet just by declaring that it's "hate speech."
Literally what I just said could be counted as "hate speech" because it's such a subjective term. It's a threat to freedom of speech.
Sincerely, Umair Chachar
It's NOT specifically about speech. By definition anyone who would deny, or ESPOUSES the denial of someone's right to exist
And that's just one of the bullshit lies you keep espousing, L!
Says the most vocally gullible person on the list, who sends a never ending stream of ridiculous bullshit stories, holocaust denials, russian propaganda, and general racist bullshit that is completely irrelevant to the supposed purpose of cypherpunks.
As you consistently mis-represent your "opponent"'s position, and try to do nothing with your "opponent"'s views but "shut it down", you are shutting down nothing other than your own strawman - but you know this, since it keeps getting pointed out to you, and you keep spewing this specific bullshit anyway.
Your persistence in this bullshit demonstrates that not only are you politically active in your communication on something you consider important, but that you continue to take only a belligerent extremist position in your communication, leading the read to assume either:
a) you are "rationally" assuming that such belligerence is beneficial to your preferred social cause/outcome; or
b) you are unaware of the egregiousness of your "techniques" of communication and therefore the disingenuousness abundantly evident in your communication tactics, and fundamentally a fool.
In either case, your level of belligerence is offensive.
Says Captain Death Squad. Sing some more paens to Duterte and Putin, some more ((exposes)), and then talk about who is offensive. <snip>