On 2016-08-03 21:18, juan wrote:
On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 18:29:32 -0700 Rayzer <rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:
On 08/03/2016 05:09 PM, juan quoted me saying:
If I were managing the project I'd be limiting improvements that would allow such things
Or else I wouldn't be doing the job right schmuck. I also have noted that I'd NEVER be doing a job like that:
(which is why I never aspired to that sort of position... my underhand toss is lousy),
Thanks for sharing... Troll.
Your comment is rather ambiguous. What's your point then? Are you finally admiting that the tor project is even more of a joke than it already was, now featuring built-in-censorship (TM)? Or what.
Rr
On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:45:11 -0700 Rayzer <rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:
On 08/02/2016 09:00 PM, jim bell wrote:
“…the committee requires that spend plans submitted by the Department of State and BBG pursuant to section 7078(c) of the act include a description of safeguards to ensure that circumvention technologies are not used for illicit purposes, such as coordinating terrorist activities or online sexual exploitation of children,” If I were managing the project I'd be limiting improvements that would allow such things
Spoken like a true americunt right-winger rayzer. Hardly surprising, no?
So you are not only admiting tha you are a right winger, you are a highly stupid right winger who's openly admiting that 'anonimity' software 'should' be sabotaged.
You aren't very bright. That's what I'm saying. If you didn't note the insinuation in what I wrote You should note it now. Troll. Rr