On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:12 AM, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/09/judge-wont-release-man-jailed-2-... https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/03/man-jailed-indefinitely-for-refu... https://arstechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/rawlsstaysinprisonruling.... https://arstechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/rawlsrehearingpetition.pd... https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/rawlsopinion.pdf https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/comply.pdf
Judge won't release man jailed 2 years for refusing to decrypt drives, suspect to remain jailed pending 5th Amendment appeal to Supreme Court.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/05/jail-looms-large-for-suspects-or...
Is I forget a valid defense when court orders demand a smartphone password? The answer seems to be yes and no. But one suspect on Tuesday gets 180 days jail.
And now the new "iphone X" unlocks just by looking at it. Cops already have no problem strong arming a finger print, this facial scan shit seems like a horrible idea.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15232069 https://medium.freecodecamp.org/why-you-should-never-unlock-your-phone-with-... http://blog.dustinkirkland.com/2013/10/fingerprints-are-user-names-not.html https://9to5mac.com/2017/06/01/fifth-amendement-passcodes-passwords-law/