On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 14:25:49 +1100 Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 11:14:06PM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 11:30:24 +1100 Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
Given how vehemently, persistently (even "religiously") that "the left" targets the removal of guns, the removal of the second amendment, it looks to some like guns ARE a thawn in the side of the empire.
No, it's just another pointless, idiotic, partisan 'issue'. Like, say, abortion.
And of course you ignored what I said. The kind of assholes who have guns in the US are the same assholes who love cops and love to shoot brown people.
Now you're into Karl's old position of "Whites killing Blacks for sport".
You seriously need to start backing that up (at least, if you want to be taken seriously)
taken seriously by whom?
https://blog.jim.com/crypto/silk-road-2-0-goes-down/#comments jim says: 2014-11-09 at 21:29
"Consider Trayvon Martin. His abuse of over the counter drugs caused brain damage, resulting outbursts of irrational violence. But should we therefore ban Robitussin for everyone? No, we should only ban it for blacks.
The kind of people who buy drugs on the Silk Road are not the kind of people who cause problems by their drug consumption. Superior people need freedom. Inferior people need supervision."
to state the obvious, you cannot take anything said by a bigot like James seriously.
I'm hearing what you're saying. Are you hearing what he is saying? If you suggest there is no possible "truth" in that quoted statement, perhaps there is none,
of course there's truth in that statement. It's completely true that James is a KKK monkey and makes no bones about it. "we should only ban it for blacks." "Superior people need freedom. Inferior people need supervision." That's the core of white-supremacist-trash 'philosophy'
Could there be a correlation between IQ, and ability to handle the side effects of Robitussin? That is, could it be true that those with low IQ are more likely to "lose it publicly" than those with a higher IQ?
discuss your white-trash-supremacist 'views' with James. I'd rather talk about astrology.
And if that question can be answered in the affirmative, can we then "give reasonable meaning" to the phrase "inferior people" by substituting it with "low IQ individuals" ??
The mind of open inquiry does not dismiss such questions merely "because they are distasteful" - facts are facts, and our job is to discover them.
The facts are plain to see. James is a textbook case of white-trash-supremacist. He's also a robotic trump shill. A trump shill like you. Trump shill and white supremacist are closely connected categories, by the way. Furthermore, James is a brazen totalitarian asshole who doesn't only want to rule over 'blacks', but over anybody who belongs to the 'inferior people' category. Now, unless you're another brazen totalitarian asshole like he is, you might want to counter his nonsense. But you're doing the opposite...