On 12/15/2016 01:10 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:

On 12/13/2016 02:34 AM, grarpamp wrote:

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:24 PM, #$%& <#$%&#$%&@gmail.com> wrote:

        nuke is worse than oil and has the same 'geopolitical
        dependencies'.

I know it has sourcing and mining issues but we know
safe open crowd reviewed plant designs and open
inspections are possible for those bold enough to
set aside secret corp profit bullshit, and obviously there
are zero emissions, except for waste. And maybe
similar source reserve timescales as hydrocarbon fuels.

The issues I have with nuclear energy, are that when things go wrong...
they go *really* wrong. Sure, they may not fail as often as they used
to, but that doesn't mean shit isn't going to *really* go sideways when
it does.

Seriously, the Fukushima disaster makes the Exxon Valdez and Deepwater
Horizon incidents look like a few guys pissed in the ocean. Nom nom nom
radioactive fish...