On 11/13/2016 10:12 PM, grarpamp wrote:

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:16 PM, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:

        I think the point is that "nobody" got the most votes so
        "nobody" should be president....

That's fine too. But without people out there explaining exactly
how that will work in peoples daily lives, how to translate and
integrate it, how to get things done... it won't happen.
And since many who would suggest nobody are often too
busy being little ragekids set on destroy, not much evolving
and explaining is getting done, and thus not many nobody
are being elected.

The way it works should be stupidly simple. If "Nobody" wins, the election is declared null and void and a new slate of candidates is offered (within some time frame shorter than the original election campaign) while the sitting executive remains in office (with perhaps reduced powers) until 'nobody' has less votes than one of the candidates offered.

Rr