I'll try to think on that a little before countering with the idea of holding belief of multiple viewpoints without conflict.

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020, 1:39 AM Zig the N.g <ziggerjoe@yandex.com> wrote:

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:48:08PM -0400, Karl wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020, 4:29 PM Punk-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:

> > > > I have schizophrenia.
> > > >
> > > >         so you believe the lies of 'scientists' regarding the fascist
> > flu
> > > > scare. And you believe the lies of the worst scumbags on the planet,
> > the
> > > > psychiatrists, when they tell you that you're crazy? Well I guess, why
> > > > would any sane person believe what his enemies tell him?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Because they are struggling to tell him the truth,
> >
> >         So you believe the worst kind of technocratic lies used to control
> > you? And you're asserting that those patent lies are "the truth"?
> >
> >         well I guess, again, in that sense, you are detached from reality.
> > If you believe what your masters tell you, you are insane. Now, how can you
> > oppose your masters if you believe their propaganda?
> >
>
> I guess I need to wrap my head around people saying the opposite of what is
> true?


The Z.g approves!

Such may be at times challenging, confronting, liberating, enlightening and a bit of a wild ride.

But, the alternative is to never doubt "your superiors" ... and more fundamentally, to suffer the consequences of never doubting "your superiors" ...