Re: Facebook is deleting the name of the potential whistleblower

On November 9, 2019 12:53:03 PM PST, jim bell wrote:

I don't think that re-publishing a name, which has probably already been re-re-re-re-re-re-re-published thousands of times, could constitute "interfering with a criminal investigation".  But your imagination may differ.              Jim Bell

You can do whatever you like until they tell you to stop. Then you can't, and I'm sure there's some legal facility for making sure leaked information gets reeled in as much as possible to avoid bungling up the investigation. There's a bunch of federal codes I'm not up on, but the above is the bottom line and that line only rises higher towards you neck, and a garrotting, if it involves national security. Rr Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail Disclaimer: I am not a Lawyer. DO NOT call me in the middle of the night for bail money.

On Saturday, November 9, 2019, 12:47:26 PM PST, Razer wrote:

This is your answer and China will stomp you if you INTERFERE WITH A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION too. So will any court system on earth.

Get psychiatric help.

"Facebook says it is removing mentions of the alleged whistleblower’s name and will revisit this decision if the name is widely published in the media or used by public figures in debate."

On November 9, 2019 10:44:33 AM PST, jim bell wrote: https://apnews.com/ad8f2a9b6e424138afcc97fcf2eb29bf

I wonder what they mean by "deleting the name"?  Do they mean deleting any posting or comment containing the name 'Eric Ciaramella'?  Or just that name?  Or any posting that says that "Eric Ciaramella is the whistleblower"? This sure sounds like Facebook is adopting the policies of Red China, "The Great Firewall of China". I've got a solution to that problem:  The people who work for Facebook are identifiable, and mortal.

Notice that the news source this story came from is "apnews".   How appropriate.              Jim Bell

Rr Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice with K-9 Mail