On 11/09/2016 11:13 AM, jim bell wrote:
>"Chaos"
is not identical to "change". Nevertheless, "Chaos" is a
state in which there is very low resistance to change.
> Jim Bell
>I disagree. The tendency of people confronted with Chaos is to
embrace what they knew did work and attempt to restore it...
traditionalism... ie. >One of the features of Fascism. No change if
it went in that direction.
If that's the case, then that ISN'T "chaos", at least not yet.
Jim Bell
+10
Addenda: Americans are confused. They mistake chaos
for change.
On 11/09/2016 09:28 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
On 11/09/2016 02:58 AM, jim bell wrote:
> What a relief!!! Thank heavens for leaks!!!
Meh. I prefer Trump by a /small/ margin; better
chaos and gridlock in
DC than a massive, well coordinated murder
machine IMO. I'm
sentimental: I hate to see millions of people
slaughtered so a
handful of billionaires can keep growing their
wealth & power right up
to the collapse of our present civilization. In
the case of Trump vs.
Clinton, better to roll the dice than accept a
status quo that assures
the highest obtainable body count.
But I don't see a Yuge victory for the humans
here, only a new set of
problems that /may/ be more tractable than those
presented by Clinton.
I was rather shocked by the election results,
because I have kept an
eye on developments in election rigging over the
years. Given the
aggregate power of entrenched interests
sponsoring Clinton and the
scale of the cash flows that Trump's election
have placed in jeopardy,
I did not expect a Trump win to be permitted.
Maybe someday we will
find out what happened behind the scenes - and
whether the FBI
director's strange behavior had anything to do
with it.
Before election day chop wood, carry water,
smash the State.
After election day chop wood, carry water, smash
the State.
:o)