On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:02:02 -0400 Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
The inherent logical disconnect between anarchy and law enforcement underlines the irrelevance of /most/ debate about how an anarchist society should be run.
Learning what lunatics like berwick and co. think is valuable. And the idea that they are representatives of anarchist philosophy is of course completely laughable.
I prefer what used to be called frontier justice: When someone makes enough trouble to motivate enough people to do something about it, they act: Maybe a good talking-to; if that fails to curb the behavior in question, maybe running the offender out of town; if that seems inadequate to protect the community, maybe killing the bastard.
Who are you planning to kill, exactly? And what sort of 'crime' gets you first a 'talk' and then gets you murdered? Not sure how any of your comments addresses any of the points I made.
Frontier justice is not perfect, but it's the best system we have.
Compare the Libertarian belief that incorruptible Courts adjudicating tort claims,
yeah but not the point at hand. And anarchy isn't frontier 'justice' either. Whatever you mean by 'justice'.
on a level playing field where wealth, power, and political prejudice provide no advantages, can exist.
:o)