Dnia sobota, 31 maja 2014 14:53:43 Cathal Garvey pisze:
The question is not whether or not you can securely disclose that you are under NSL. The question is whether you can do so without, when the word breaks, being in trouble for leaking that information.
So yes, you can establish all sorts of wonderful contraptions that "get the word out", publicly or privately, on or off-shore, so that the people outside can disseminate warnings that you've been compromised. But in the end, the stasi will blame you, and no matter how much cooked-up legal convolution you wrap yourself in, they will nail you to a cross.
My view is that engaging in such convolutions serves two counterproductive ends: 1) It makes it seem as if you acknowledge that you should not be disclosing the NSL; a Jury, if you were so lucky and were actually allowed to testify before them in your defence (lol Grand Jury) would be suspicious of your motives. Why all the cloak-and-dagger? It's easy for the prosecution to make you seem shady and suspicious for acting in that way.
2) It delays your disclosure and allows the stasi time and opportunity to preempt and prevent your disclosure entirely.
Good points, thanks. -- Pozdr rysiek