data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3355f/3355fdc64089b6b4bf02aaf9ef03fd8dd431025c" alt=""
20 Feb
2016
20 Feb
'16
3:27 p.m.
Jason McVetta wrote:
I presume an actually-secure phone would be highly illegal for a civilian commoner to possess.
There's no such thing as 'secure' with any form, of electronic communication. There's "More secure". -- RR "Through counter-intelligence it should be possible to pinpoint potential trouble-makers ... And neutralize them, neutralize them, neutralize them"