On Wednesday, August 14, 2019, 12:37:48 AM PDT, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote: https://github.com/Enegnei/JacobAppelbaumLeavesTor/blob/master/JacobAppelbau... Some elements are now in court, there are a number of people filing statements, here is one of them... https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.340308/gov.uscourts.ca... For Exhibits A through P, run the 0.pdf from 1.pdf through 16.pdf . UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION PETER TODD, an individual, Case No. 4:19-cv-01751-DMR Plaintiff, DECLARATION OF JACOB APPELBAUM v. IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S SPECIAL SARAH MICHELLE REICHWEIN aka MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S ISIS AGORA LOVECRUFT, an COMPLAINT (ANTI-SLAPP MOTION) individual, Date: August 22, 2019 Defendant. Time: 1:00 p.m. Location: Courtroom 4 Complaint Filed: April 3, 2019 [snip] Jim Bell's comment: It looks like the defendant is confused, claiming "SLAPP" (Strategic Lawsuit against Public Participation) status.See: https://www.gofundme.com/f/isis-lovecruft-legal-defense "On July 15, 2019, Lovecruft filed an anti-SLAPP motion , asking the Court to dismiss Todd’s lawsuit. “SLAPP” is an acronym for Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation. California’s anti-SLAPP law enables the Court to weed out lawsuits brought to punish citizens for engaging in free expression on matters of public concern, such as discussions of predatory male behavior in the #MeToo and #TimesUpera of hopeful awakening." [end of quote] See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_lawsuit_against_public_participation I feel quite certain that the anti-SLAPP laws would not be applicable in the case of a libel lawsuit. From what I read (and I wasn't aware of this case before) Lovecruft accused Todd of rape. That accusation, if false, would clearly be libelous, Libel is an exception to free speech in the First Amendment. Maybe it shouldn't be, but at least as of now libel is actionable. Jim Bell