On 5/9/17, James A. Donald <jamesd@echeque.com> wrote:
On 2017-05-08 22:39, \0xDynamite wrote:
Given the website you cited, I think YOU are cherry picking your methodology.
I link to a cite
The word is "site" and it's a bullshit, non-scientific site.
that shows scientists forging data to manufacture global warming alarm: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/08/the-smoking-gun-at-darwin-zero/
...with a title that already pushes the conclusion...
Where is cherry picking?
Where is your real concern? Truth or victory? \0x
I'll make this simple, dumbasses. You don't need ANY evidence to conclude LOGICALLY and NECESSARY that billions of years of fossil fuel burned in 400 years of industrialism is going to have MASSIVE effects.
You are innumerate. Human activity, compared to natural forces, is like a gnat farting.
False. And "innumerate" would mean what? Human activity multiplied by 6 billion is not a gnat farting. Do you see how you just want to win? This example is so childish, you might as well stick your head in your ass. You'll at least get some data. \0x