On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 16:31:04 -0500 "\\0xDynamite" <dreamingforward@gmail.com> wrote:
Tell us quinn what to do with people like you, who post very stupid 'defenses' of CENSORSHIP in an allegedly crypto-anarchist mailing list?
He's differentiating between floods of off-topic material which acts to censor real discussion by hiding it in noise vs. removing discussion which simply doesn't agree with some (explicit or implicit) preferential view.
So you failed to understand all the points I made, or are you just trolling me?
Actually, I incorporated your points, figuring they were too simple to enumerate and incorporated them within the last sentence of the first paragraph.
Should I take that as mmeaning that you see and understand that quinn is nothing but a crass apologist of censorship and that his 'argument' for it is nonsensical at best, or just trolling? Because what I'm getting from your two messages is that you didn't mention the points I made (you explicityl deleted them) and you followed quinn's wrong analogy about spam. So for completness' sake. SPAM has LITTLE TO DO WITH THE CENSORSHIP ISSUE. Blocking mass, unsolicited advertising, sent by machines is not the same thing as blocking INDIVIDUAL messages from PEOPLE based on POLITICAL grounds. "He's differentiating between..." No he isn't. He wants people to go from "blocking spam is OK" to "blocking whatever I want to block is OK". You don't get that, or what. "You have to admit that it's different, si? WHAT is differnt? I have to admit that you are either agreeing with quinn, or if you are agreeing with me, you are doing it in a very cryptic way. Oh OK, since one of the topics here is cryptography, you post cryptic remarks? Makes sense somehow...or other.
'Nuff said.
\0x