On Mon, Jul 5, 2021, 5:56 PM Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021, 8:48 PM David Barrett <dbarrett@expensify.com> wrote:
If so, can you help me understand why you support Sweden prosecuting an ordinary person, but you do not support them prosecuting Assange?
I formed an opinion on that, now. It's not the one you say I have.
Ok just to confirm, does that mean you *do* support Sweden prosecuting Assange for sexual assault, irrespective of whatever happens with the US? (I'm sorry, the double negative was confusing me.) [Meditation for criminal cases] is actually available, just not in all the
legal systems.
To my knowledge, no nation uses meditation as you describe for criminal trials (eg, murder). Are you saying that some do? Can you point me to which you are modeling your recommendation on so I can learn more? This is again a situation where [out current system] is usually better than
[nothing], but [nothing] is better in cases of very frivolous or mis-ordered accusations.
Ok! This helps me understand your position! You argree that our justice system is "usually" better than nothing, right? This is important so I just really want to double confirm before I build on this. Thanks! David