On 07/21/2016 11:17 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
On 07/22/2016 12:25 AM, John wrote:
> On July 21, 2016 11:22:36 PM EDT, Rayzer
<rayzer@riseup.net>
> wrote:
>> I was probably wrong about my statement he doesn't have
the
>> technical capability to examine code like ioerror
>>
> Actually I believe he wrote a book on coding cryptography,
example
> code in C. He can code.
> https://www.schneier.com/books/applied_cryptography/
> Hes also written at least a few open source tools, e.g.
> passwordsafe.
And AES finalist Twofish. (What we now call "AES" is actually
Rijndael, see http://csrc.nist.gov/archive/aes/index2.html )
In the essay above, I did note a thread of pro-Establishment
political
correctness running all through the rhetoric. Does he really buy
it,
is he just protecting his tenure in the Corporate Suits hierarchy,
or
is he tying a pork chop around the necks of a few inconvenient
truths
in hope that policymakers will at least play with them?
Only Bruce Schneier knows the real Bruce Schneier Facts. If I had
to
guess, I would say all three. One thing we do know: You won't
catch
him consorting with the peasants.
:o)
>
The essay illustrates he understands how political and social power
affects technology and science.
That knowledge can cut both ways.
Here's a little bit of humor slander about him...
"I think he's Grey." (snigger)
Rr