John has yet to post a notice on his site alerting users to the log's leaking and the possible compromise, but he has added a warning about a "growing censor-tamper-implant-bowdlerize-redact-tag-track of archives, torrents, drops, shares, wikis, disclosure sites." So that's something?

Mirrors of the Cryptome Archive should be accessed with caution, none have been authenticated by Cryptome and sigs can be faked to hide tampering. There is growing censor-tamper-implant-bowdlerize-redact-tag-track of archives, torrents, drops, shares, wikis, disclosure sites.

I guess John was right before. "Compromise should be publicized but seldom is: hide, deny, ignore, delude."

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Michael Best <themikebest@gmail.com> wrote:

You can read through the emails for yourself, no doubt. Start with the original email about the GCHQ slide with redacted IPs, where I ask for verification/validation.

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
Show me the email where you called for help ... i have been traveling heavy so missed it

The type of work of forensics research is important and how ot is conducted is as well

Its not about my personal stamp of approval it is about community and respecting of and embodiment of the community

If anyone including john is being a fucker we need to account for that

On Oct 10, 2015 12:04 PM, "Michael Best" <themikebest@gmail.com> wrote:
The list had been involved since the first post about the GCHQ slide. The list was no help at all.

Sorry you don't approve, Cari, but what's done is done. The list was consulted and no help. John Young refused to acknowledge the problem - or fix it. [sarcasm] But what's terribly wrong is that I reported it - not that John leaked it or lied it about it when he kept denying it or anything else. [/sarcasm]

Cari Machet carimachet@gmail.com
Sat Oct 10 04:51:59 EDT 2015
Still michael best you could have consulted the list here That someone calls you a liar therefor you act is an ego based mindset Answer why you decided to not consult this list that has profoundly smart
beings on it You could have asked this list for help we are interested in helping with
such matters i would say and you could have done so without revealing info
... did this never cross your mind ? If it never even crossed your mind to consult us i find there is something
terribly wrong

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:01 AM, coderman <coderman@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/9/15, Michael Best <themikebest@gmail.com> wrote:
> ... *they never would've been published. *

i find it useful to think of voice. published yes, with little voice.

now it's most certainly a loud something!
the published always was, however...