On 10/25/2015 05:08 PM, Cari Machet wrote: <SNIP>
I am totally clear that i can not engage empathy if i have such judgements about armed struggle to call it counter revolutionary ... should the spanish had committed mass suicide ... should the palestinians ? Math is a factor we only have so many functionalities to work with and until these functionalities are expanded more thru serious fucking profound massive work it cannot be different
People are working to expand functionalities now and doing amazing work but there are many ways to dismantle the state i cannot shove one way into oblivion in my mind because i dont know everything so... each frame is different and to me respecting anothers frame is fucking anarchism and without the respect of the other aspect anarchy would be too weak or what would it even be?
I make my own decisions about fighting. I read "settle the disputes of their rulers and de facto owners" to mean fighting for them, out of loyalty, fear or whatever. That's distinct from fighting against them. More generally, I believe in nonaggression, and self defense.
Not sure why you have to write specifically about me steve On Oct 26, 2015 3:34 AM, "Mirimir" <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 10/25/2015 12:00 PM, grarpamp wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Steve Kinney <admin@pilobilus.net> wrote:
War is public murder for private profit. ... Everyone who takes up arms to settle the disputes of their rulers and de facto owners is a traitor to the human race as a whole. ... The "fog of war" has another name, propaganda
This.
Yes, that!
(Oh fuck, there I go fucking up my oneliner score again, might as well throw in a few fucks for good measure, as if I give a fuck, at least this next fuck from some other fucker might count as one more fuck to the good, lol...)
study the fuck out of war and encourage others to do likewise.