Re: [ot][spam][crazy] Fiction: Index Trees for Random-Access Data on Append-Only Storage

"Considering Append-Only Trees". They wore a shirt saying this. They sat in a workroom with their friends, also wearing shirts. One of the friend's shirts said "FlushRegion". Another's said "ChunkRange (Flush.Entry) Concepts". They were having a pleasant time doing what was written on their shirt, with their friends. After some time, "Considering Append-Only Trees" asked a question. Considering Append-Only Trees: "What is the relevant, important thing we're doing with the ChunkRanges in the FlushRegions?" If functionality for this were added first, it would ensure the work fully included its reason in its structure.