Angling for a cabinet post Zen?

On November 24, 2016 8:42:52 AM EST, Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
Re the discussion of fascism, I particularly like the thought catalytic
arising from extract point 6 below.



The Fight for the Alt-Right: The Rising Tide of Ideological Autism
Against Big Tent-Supremacy
https://atlanticcenturion.wordpress.com/2016/03/05/the-fight-for-the-alt-right-the-rising-tide-of-ideological-autism-against-big-tent-supremacy/
Posted on 2016-03-05

Extract:
"
So what are the tenets of the big tent? I believe they are as follows:

1.) People are different. Human inequality is a fact of life and belief
systems that deny this lead to distortion and oppression. Both
individuals and populations vary in their characteristics in
meaningful ways, such as intelligence and social behavior. One size
does not fit all, not comfortably at least.

2.) Our world is tribal. The struggle for survival which has produced
all life on earth extends into biological human races, which both
exist and matter to their members. Such conflict is neither immoral
nor moral, but a condition we must engage with in order to develop any
meaningful philosophy or ideology. It can be found on the streets, in
the human resources department, at the ballot box, or in the trenches.
Even something as trivial as the Oscars is fought over. Though it is
currently politically incorrect to acknowledge that races and their
national subdivisions exist and compete for resources, land, and
influence over one another or over themselves, that does not mean the
struggle has stopped. That one side has been cajoled into not
struggling does not mean it is left alone.

3.) Our tribe is being suppressed. The new left doctrine of racial
struggle in favor of non-whites only, a product of decolonization and
the defeat of nationalists by egalitarians after WWII, must be
repudiated and Whites must be allowed to take their own side in their
affairs. A value system that says Whites are not allowed to have
collective interests and literally every other identity group can do
so and ought to do so is unacceptable.

4.) Men are not women and women are not men. Men and women have roles to
fulfill for the species to persist in a stable and healthy way.
Feminism and the sexual revolution, by destroying the conditions that
promoted and sustained heterosexual monogamy, have had disastrous
implications for the sexes and relationships between them. (I highly
recommend F. Roger Devlin’s Sexual Utopia in Power here for those
interested in more). No viable society can exist where the long-term
union of one man and one woman producing a replacement level of
offspring is not the norm. Some Western countries have obscured the
impact of sexual degeneracy on birthrates by importing foreigners, but
such measures only further the destruction of nations; they do not
sustain a people but keep a state’s balance sheets in order.

5.) Freedom is a responsibility and not a right. The freedom of too many
incompetent people to make too many bad decisions is harmful to
society and constrains the freedom of virtuous and responsible people.
There are externalities to most actions and when these are harmful to
non-actors it is a kind of injustice. These need to campaigned
against, or suppressed by force or the threat of force—the basis of
the rule of law. A virtuous society is an ordered one that provides
freedom from anarcho-tyranny.

6.) If we must be a democratic society, the franchise should be limited.
Universal democracy is a bad system. It gives power to the worst and
shackles the fittest. It is a degenerative institution in which the
weak and unproductive collaborate against the strong and sustainable.
"

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.