On 7/5/19 3:18 AM, jim bell wrote: [...]
She was obviously guilty of violation of the Federal Records Act, which required her to arrange to have the contents of her private server backed up, essentially continuously, with the government, to the National Archives. She did not do that. She also had her staff delete 33,000 emails: Her justification is that those were "personal". That was a lie, too.
"Socialized" people interpret their experience of the material world in the context of an acquired "world view" which guides or, in most instances, controls their perception and interpretation of material conditions and events, and governs their responses to same. To "participate in society" necessarily includes compliance with dominant propaganda narratives, at least to the extent of knowing them and adjusting one's behavior to take their existence into account. Example: Our propagandists made an enormous Political Issue of Mrs. Clinton's private e-mail server: Both "because" it existed, and "because" of bulk deletion of content potentially including criminal evidence. But concurrently, our propagandists briefly and quietly reported the bare bones facts of Mrs. Clinton's separate felony offenses involving deliberate violations of the National Security Act, then fell silent on that subject. Mrs. Clinton reportedly removed classification markings from controlled documents and forwarded them to people not cleared to receive them. She also instructed her staff to do likewise, a separate and even more serious felony offense. Mrs. Clinton's status as an attorney, and the fact that she did sign a Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement, removes any doubt regarding her criminal intent and should qualify her for enhanced sentencing: https://www.archives.gov/files/isoo/security-forms/sf312.pdf "I hereby acknowledge that I have received a security indoctrination concerning the nature and protection of classified information, including the procedures to be followed in ascertaining whether other persons to whom I contemplate disclosing this information have been approved for access to it, and that I understand these procedures." The simple, unambiguous nature of these e-mail related crimes accounts for the (relative) silence of our propagandists on that topic: No defense or evasion based on accusations of partisan bias can 'make them didn't happen'. Mrs. Clinton can not pretend she "did not know" her actions were felonies. The refusal of Federal law enforcement to bring charges demonstrates that Mrs. Clinton enjoys de facto immunity from the legal system that governs lesser mortals. As this bluntly contradicts the foundational myth of "equal justice under law", under the rug it goes. How lucky for Mrs. Clinton that the FBI simply "forgot" to impound her computers and image their hard drives in the course of a criminal investigation based on the content of those hard drives. Even if she had been charged, procedural stalling based on this circumstance would assure that she died of old age before the disposition of her charges. In context with the above, the Trump Regime's failure to bring obstruction of justice charges against the Obama Regime's fixers in the FBI indicates Trump's commitment to support "class privilege" and, most likely, fear of retaliatory violations of his own class privilege should he get "out of line" with anything but his mouth.