On 2/2/20, other.arkitech <other.arkitech@protonmail.com> wrote:
The proposal is to replace current Governments with a low-cost distributed machine that would collect inputs and produce outputs
Sure, that is all good and interesting to try.
not apply filters in people's input. The system would be able to let people decide whether if a 'road' is convenient or not, and how to fund it.
What if the people decide USPS is inconvenient due to license inability to hack and fork, or is being too centralized monetized premined controlled by all these "business investors" and "private invites". People will leave it with no adoption, and all USPS people names and funds die with it. Even from old age who going to enforce or care then. And when people simply reverse engineer or clone around and make a new better than USPS system. At least actual opensource distributed forkable as needed might survives with good reverence and actual freedom. How can peopel think trying to teach new voluntaryism model of "letting people decide" without force concerning "whatabout muh roads"... can be honestly taught using a software application students will eventually discover is based on non-voluntary license force. Did not some students rise to destroy this conflicting master. How to not apply filters to peoples tools.
Everything is better compared to our current model of participation in the society based on ticking a box every 4 or 5 years.
Then don't tick any box. And write code boxes to bypass them. Or tick the Libertarian box if you want to see Stasi boy go postal. Sure maybe there is no problem making private money in some ways, just that truth should be disclaimed in front. "spend years of my life learning to code improvements/modules to particular software platform, it might as bloody well be something I can continue to do if I leave my present corporation"