On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 19:07:13 +0000 Peter Fairbrother <peter@tsto.co.uk> wrote:
On 18/03/2021 18:08, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
https://www.vice.com/en/article/epd3km/sky-ecc-hacked-fake-app
those are ordinary, FULLY backdoored phones with some stuff like gps receiver allegedly removed and so marginally less toxic. Now, any 'criminakl' worth his salt would make the modifications himself, not buy a 'phone for criminals' on the arpanet. Or he would buy a phone from pine64.org
Software wise, any 'criminal' worth his salt would use a p2p program like tox, or set up his own server, or even use the pentagon's tor network. The 'criminal' could also add a layer of unbreakable 'military grade' encryption in the form of one time pads. After all the 'criminals' are likely to meet in person and so they don't need piece-of-shit public key crypto.
Wow you know your crypto. Not.
Enlighten me and the rest of the list then. You are one of the masters of philosophy here, having so far parroted the worst kind of govt propaganda on every possible topic. I'm sure your knowledge of 'secure phones' is as good as your knowledge of the flu farce and other false flag attacks.