-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/29/2015 01:18 PM, Lodewijk andré de la porte wrote:
2015-10-29 16:55 GMT+01:00 Razer <Rayzer@riseup.net <mailto:Rayzer@riseup.net>>:
You use the word "I" a lot. I aim for a society where "We" is primary.
Conflict resolution and nonviolent strategy training emphasize the value of "I statements" because they personalize what one is saying rather than appealing to some "authority" such as the imagined Will of the People, the rules in a game nobody present has volunteered to play, etc. I like I statements, if only because they make it all about me.
The idea that you can force people to act in the common interest has been tried many times. We prefer to have freedom, nowadays. At least, I do.
(To be spoken in the voice of Max Headroom:) Ah, freedom. Such a glittering generality! It makes me want to march in a parade!
Game theory puts wrenches in any collaborative action that's not entirely individual centered. Go let the pigs ravage you, I'll just wait to discuss an arrangement with them once they're through with you. I just hope you didn't give them absolutely unmatchable unfair advantages. (footnote: did you ever see a B-52 bomber in real life?)
The longevity of a culture tends to be inversely proportional to the power of entirely self centered individuals in that culture. Any collaborative action that's entirely individual centered evolves into a murder/suicide machine, even if it does not start out as one. Lookit the good ole U.S.A. after 35 years of Reganomics and Greed Is Good business ethics and corporate culture. Darwinian evolution does not favor the greedy, self-interested individual. Darwinian evolution favors clusters of individuals whose predisposition to take care of others assures that their Nth generation progeny have the best shot at survival because they are supported by a stable and resilient community. When "the smartest guys in the room" say otherwise, they are not mistaken: They are lying. Collaborative actions based on a sane balance between individual and community interests are possible, history provides numerous examples at scales ranging from the family and village to tribe and nation. With the exception of defective individuals, human beings are naturally inclined to form communities, to identify with those communities, and to work in the common interests of those communities. I call the people who lack this natural inclination "defective" as their actions tend toward negative impacts on group survival in the long term. Today we have a really big problem in the form of really big countries: Human communities do not scale to that size. Compare the "community values" performance of Iceland, population 1/3 million, to the performance of the good ole U.S.A., population 360+ million. Attempts to scale community values to the size of a large country always involve creating administrative classes, insular communities of professionals in commercial and political governance who facilitate artificial "bonds of community" between massive numbers of strangers who will never meet. Viola, rent seeking absentee landlords who employ armed guards to enforce their orders. If communities regulated by these institutions are small enough, it is possible for the people to regulate their regulators; but somewhere between 1/3 and 300 million population, the balance of power shifts disastrously toward the managerial class, which becomes a ruling class. Expositions of political theory are supposed to end with a formula for creating Utopian outcomes, and a call to action. Sorry, I'm out of stock on those items and the shop down the street was busted for selling toxic imitations. But I do think that those who occupy themselves with building, maintaining and defending sane communities, where and as opportunities to do so arise, will be big winners compared to those who remain attached to authoritarian top-down rule by any name. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWMsJ/AAoJEDZ0Gg87KR0L2pIP/1C21Qaqr9fsxQrfE1e7OVjC XhwUKYgST0hOJ26ueN7Lsq9vYyxZBtgdW1JReJqEwJ3sUnGlIv8WXI7dHe+80ior R0B1gKTBSQd9gUGkcE6QnTgJ6tJxShm1MDrfJjWxMNMEjo8lhY9anRuEiIr+vplI +SSd3VvLGZlKrD9m2VlovI/pEIKZmyXa278i6rs8eM6TVzq2K1AbCyhTK7/9fmIV eNd3IkOzNtb9vqgCKP3qeKUMSN2AlRikqZCO25ZLdjbcDs0qYb26d1dPvfI0yWY6 PxToc2cDlaYanLOZjOtMCoLHFLq0a4fXUO0Y+zK+AhbxIjaLX612bzAVNDatGI+U nBYTvDxBQonrplTNCLDAJRiq9avl+oPDQGgOqJSBwb37X8UBzSbeJFlujaI8xxom jJKjBICo+blE9195YsLWYjazajaTKzWo/e2enS3eMn+JgVA70n0OMMN6eLjhQdfL TpzEYXO5JywsNRoX0S8IfSs58mxmvVjzrC4NR4H5mqgb0d+pJB8CTDpmo/EMuziy YQZxhiISsMopn2GX4w9pUO10HSBefKCcPqPrQorDM9tWHoSZqwi9cPyK1jcg/wTE EnO9KMHlHgKyWZfOD+8qFz1AqL+bdrDKxChZlkyUqfw98eY8IxCbaiHr/m3QY0uB YlNKceRmjnyY9t/G7Jp9 =6nQs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----