9th Circ. Lets Atty Fight Against $8M Malicious Prosecution <https://www.law360.com/legalethics/articles/1872244?nl_pk=153d4a8a-6fb9-4a5f-b7aa-0651cdd34b32&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=legalethics&utm_content=2024-08-22&read_main=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=1> By Emily Sawicki A Nevada attorney may take to the federal court to challenge an Arizona state court's civil judgment finding him liable for malicious prosecution, the Ninth Circuit determined Wednesday, finding the federal district court was wrong to toss his claims on the grounds they were barred by jurisdictional precedent established in the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. Opinion attached | Read full article » <https://www.law360.com/legalethics/articles/1872244?nl_pk=153d4a8a-6fb9-4a5f-b7aa-0651cdd34b32&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=legalethics&utm_content=2024-08-22&read_more=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=1> | Save to favorites » <https://www.law360.com/legalethics/articles/1872244?nl_pk=153d4a8a-6fb9-4a5f-b7aa-0651cdd34b32&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=legalethics&utm_content=2024-08-22&read_later=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=1>