Sir i am not in your head I get it john young leaked logs you pointed it out he waffled and then did admit it but sir you also leaked logs unredacted and i see no evidence of an ask by you of this list for help It could have been "hey is anyone interested in helping me get through this difficulty with a compromised log of a site" simple stuff ... if no one replied another more pointed ask could have come but instead you replicated Listen have a think on what is being critisized about your process ... criticizm can be healthy to absorb and we can shift out like that ...thru council with others we can have many minds On Oct 10, 2015 8:50 PM, "Michael Best" <themikebest@gmail.com> wrote:
Did you see the first one where I asked for help verifying the information in redacted form, specifically from John Young/Cryptome but in no way excluding the list?
Or that after I posted the redacted version of the logs, and before John Young first denied they were real (before denying it again then admitting it again), he sent me an email saying ""Keep at it."
Or my general request on Twitter, which wasn't limited to the list and occurred after the list had been alerted to the matter? https://twitter.com/NatSecGeek/status/651760609189568512
Ok i read it all see no fucking ask of this community for help on the matter