If you are claiming that it is okay for an agent of the State of California (University of California at Berkeley is such an agent) to discriminatorally deny a person the right to use a venue which is regularly offered to others, discrimination which is on the basis of the content of that speech, then I feel free to cite the U.S. Constitution to challenge that assertion. The State employees are legally required to adhere to their own rules, and that includes letting Milo Y. have access to the location which was already commonly offered to many others for public assembly and speeches.

Jim Bell

From: Joshua Case <jwcase@gmail.com>

Jim- come on It's only confusing or vague if you're pretending to be in a court. I know you did your time in the system, as did I, but out here you don't have to defend your opinion from statute. -Joshua

> On Feb 2, 2017, at 6:47 PM, juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 14:47:49 -0800
> Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
>
>> "Free speech means you have legal right to expression; not entitlement
>> to huge public platform or to be a racist in public w/o being
>> punched."
>
>
> LMAO at the sick piece of shit being quoted and the sick piece
> of shit who quotes him..Notice also 'anarcho' turd rayzer
> invoking yet again US government doctrine.
>
> Here's the deal though : rayzer IS a fully fledged national
> socialist or national communist or fascist, who promotes the
> existence of concentration camps like cuba. He's an apologist
> of slavey and the murdering of dissenters.
>
> Following his own lunatic (fascist) views regarding free speech,
> he should be shot on sight. If rayzer wants to enslave millions
> of people in commie concentration camps he should be treated
> like a wild dangerous animal.
>