Well, people (?)  have been speaking quite recently about apparent problems with the Cypherpunks list email-acceptance reliability.  Do we (or you?) have any reason to believe such reports are deliberately phony?  I think the large majority of comments I've made recently to CP (days, weeks) have proceeded promptly.  So when I see an aberration, I identify it as such.

After about 74 minutes of non-appearance of that message, at least failing to return back to me in a virtually comment free list (indicating that the server can't possibly be 'busy'), I think any logical person familiar with the working of email lists (and specifically CP) would suspect that the sent message had simply been "lost", and the logical response would have been to re-post it, as I did.

Yet, you are strongly implying that my interpretation of events was somehow wrong or even illogical.  

On Sunday, November 3, 2019, 12:06:56 PM PST, Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:


>Just because you haven't received your copy yet (or at all) doesn't mean we haven't.

Just because you MAY have received your copy (you might be lying; presumably, we'll hear from others soon enough to determine if my first attempt to send the message actually got through to anyone else) doesn't mean you have a correct position.)  You MIGHT have only seen the second message, which included the original header, and decided to muddy the water and 'score points' by implying that I interpreted events incorrectly.)

  And, I note, nobody else responded (yet)  to my recent first attempt to send that message.  Had I received even one such answer,  that would have suggested that the CP server had successfully posted my message.  The absence of any response,  to me, even 74 minutes later, at least doesn't contradict the idea that the CP server had somehow coughed and failed, at least on one email.


>Rr
>Sent from my Androgyne dee-vice

>Ps. Get psychiatric help


Your illogical reactions, could also reflect YOUR need for such psychiatric help.   I, at least, can actually justify my actions and reasoning.  Put simply, I'm believable, and you are not.