On 01/19/2017 11:47 PM, No wrote:
Wrong thread > https://theintercept.com/2016/11/29/something-happened-to-activist-email-pro...
Wasn't the intercept. It was a twitter account of some org affiliated with riseup but thanks for the link. Rr
On 2017-01-20 05:44, Razer wrote:
On 01/19/2017 08:11 PM, grarpamp wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13007234
Not as if anything should be thought untouchable.
I saw something on a twitter feed related to them that said they would be updating it and not to worry and this info is old.
Have you checked?
Check test 1 2...
gpg --verify canary-statement-signed.txt
gpg: Signature made Mon 15 Aug 2016 10:01:19 PM PDT using RSA key ID 139A768E gpg: Good signature from "Riseup Networks <collective@riseup.net>" gpg: aka "Riseup Treasurer <treasurer@riseup.net>" gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 4E07 9126 8F7C 67EA BE88 F1B0 3043 E2B7 139A 768E
The canary hasn't been updated but the gpg output still shows a good sig (assuming)
They could still kill the canary be revoking the key, and they haven't done that.
See: https://riseup.net/en/canary
Rr