-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/16/2016 12:19 AM, juan wrote:
In part because of the time that passed between the first, exceptionally damaging public release of Manning's material, and the arrest - some time after the third exceptionally damaging release.
WHat damaging releases were those? I can think of the 'collateral murder' video as somewhat upsetting to the pentagon's propaganda efforts, for a few weeks, but that was all.
The 'collateral murder' video hit Iraq during negotiations with the 3rd (?) post-conquest iteration of an allegedly sovereign Iraqi government for continued U.S. occupation and control of Iraq. It pissed the Iraqi public off so badly that continued 100% immunity from local prosecution of U.S. persons for any and all crimes including murder was taken off the table. In consequence of this, the U.S. occupation force was pulled out of Iraq. This was more than a little inconvenient, it was bloody expensive. The U.S. proxy force "formerly known as" ISIS have a dual mission: West of the Syria/Iraq border, the ongoing destabilization of Syria to prevent construction of oil & gas pipelines from Iran to a BRICS-friendly Mediterranean seaport. East of the border, to force the Iraqis to allow U.S. occupation forces back in to "protect" Iraq from an invading armed force and assure continued US/NATO control of Iraqi oil. The Cablegate and War Diaries releases both stirred diplomatic anthills, complicating or terminating numerous U.S. foreign policy operations in progress, causing direct losses on numerous fronts and imposing global scale damage control tasks. All of the above cost money - a damn lot of it - and tied up human resources that would have otherwise been very productively engaged in business as usual, i.e. looting the planet. Compare and contrast this impact to that of the well controlled Snowden leak, which has caused a bit of embarrassment while serving the practical purpose of putting the U.S. civilian population on notice that Big Brother really is watching their every move. On the domestic political warfare front, State and Corporate actors would not necessarily view this as a Bad Thing, as cultivating paranoia is one of their long term self-defense missions. Somebody probably located in Germany has since handed the world NSA docs with more practical impact on U.S. espionage operations than the whole Snowden Affair to date, and the U.S. public at large has no idea it even happened. Propaganda costs money and nobody on this side of the Atlantic seems to be interested in paying for play in this case.
And you didn't really address my points, especially the fact that it is safer to physically mail stuff.
I would not call that a 'fact' without considering that physically mailing storage media has its own inherent risks. IIRC, Wikileaks' advertised postal addresses are in "Five Eyes" territory, so nothing will be delivered via post without e-z and unavoidable State inspection and approval. Arranging any physical delivery method that might be more secure would require two-way communication in advance with Wikileaks, so why not simplicate matters by using the same "secure" comms channel to transmit the docs and have done with it? :o) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXs0svAAoJEECU6c5XzmuqXvYIAJPaLqjIQIlcw0WhO6K/Zjo9 AuTPhZwa7HRY4Ma4dKNHG8fvKpHezdiUbdRYHMlQ0MTk1M4bE5eBkKopJ3lRKWBY YfgcWKiPAtjc9WniTJC4yjYSc2v3bObWvawOg74VzB1ml4FEG9MsNwqzbgpiO1lP ubmJgX1AZNgKO6TJurXBnY4h6Wwph+Z7bJRGMyxldWzf1z8fHLJ7uwc5rK191HKT N3uaKb6yGDMn8izYK4xd6hNVtK96sNFDdXNyXpNKq1bslOEf9Q1645LS8+s7xBg9 nHO8oa69lKGKkk7BUAojcvQSpwpMN3DzgEXqwx6z41BsSBrRBCpcuOgjEXv65so= =XwHK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----