On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 07:45:00AM +0000, jim bell wrote:
From: Razer <g2s@riseup.net> On 02/12/2017 05:16 PM, jim bell wrote:
From: Razer <g2s@riseup.net>
Accounts created specifically to harass. But they aren't saying how: https://blog.twitter.com/2017/an-update-on-safety ...and no one writing it up seems to know either
What I want to know, is: What is their definition of the word, "harass"? >>Contradict? Disprove? Argue against? Make unhappy? Is Twitter going to adopt a consistent policy that political statements aren't allowed? >> Jim Bell
Ask @Support or @jack. Maybe they can tell you.
I would guess it's what their policy always was. If you think their policy is 'inconsistent' that's because it depends on who gets harassment complaints against them that are verifiable. But I'm still waiting for a definition of "harassment". Do you have your own?
"Razzer's gone wild" - definitions for the modern man: harassment - marketing / propaganda fascist - marketing / propaganda tolerant - marketing / propaganda liberal - marketing / propaganda inclusive - marketing / propaganda