On 2.10.2013 21:23, Jim Bell wrote:
What if, for example, the Feds were no longer able to prosecute 70,000 people per year (the current figure, approximately), but instead were limited to, say, 5,000 per year? Jim Bell
Jim, this argument does not work and it is really dangerous because : - if there is some totalistic system/strong law enforcing, than atmosphere of terror could destroy whatever people try during time - there where already "electronic terrorism" raids and prosecutions in cases like 4chan/anonymous when LOIC was used - a lot of people just joined DDoSing of some servers and they where thinking "we are many, no problem" and it was So I find this argument serously dangerous, because "System" is just gristmill and relatively a lot of time, to finish its job. Basically LAW against BC should not be approved by society. ~ Over -- “Borders I have never seen one. But I have heard they exist in the minds of some people.” ― Thor Heyerdahl www...................http://overdrive.a-nihil.net twitter...............https://twitter.com/#!/idoru23 GoogleTalk/Jabber.....tpetru@gmail.com last.fm...............http://www.last.fm/user/overdrive23 GnuPG public key......http://overdrive.a-nihil.net/overdrive.txt GnuPG key FingerPrint.072C C0AD 88EF F681 5E52 5329 8483 4860 6E19 949D