On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:30:00AM +0000, Razer wrote:
James A. Donald asked a stupid question:
why the brass knuckles and the many-on-one odds?
I can't speak for the participants but quite simply any way you kill a nazi is a good way.
Interesting.
They think people they target are subhuman.
They have thoughts with which you (one can presume here) disagree. Fair enough.
So they earn subhuman treatment from the people they target.
And ... deserve to be pre-emptively murdered for said views. Gotcha. "Libertarian" I suppose.
And saying that makes the potential victim just like the victimizer is a logical fallacy. It's also a sociological fallacy that someone peaceful whose existence is threated by someone whose violent will continue to be violent after the threat from their victimizer is exterminated. Whereas the victimizer... IF they're left to go about their way will simply commit another act of violence against another victim their ideology tells them is subhuman.
Rr
Because the victim-with-a-different-point-of-view suffering random acts of violence and pre-emptive murder for his views ... ensures the victim won't perpetrate further acts of violence, like speaking his views publicly. Ahah! "The victim is the perpetrator!" Of course - why didn't I think of that?! No wonder I felt like I was missing something - such erudite elucidations require extensive dissection ... TFW you feel "more libertarian" by the second, when reading Rayzer's psycho pathetic "free speech" emanations.