re broken thread Subject: Evidence of Enforcement Workers Portraying Activists as Criminal You have to audit the code to claim it is clean. All anyone else had to do was point to their lies, dodging, censorship, already proving dirty project behaviour. Do you want that in your unaudited crypto messaging, in those apps, from such people? You decide. Since you already use everything else unaudited, you probably do. At least admit it instead of trying to incorrectly claim they are saints. On gnupg, 'Dohm" used context "we" referring to, and directly joining himself into status of being part of, the devel group, the projects themselves. Their fake language did not hide that. The OSInt done by people years ago was sufficient to back the position of the investigators. Nothing about the projects has changed since then, no explanations were ever offered, no convincing rationale proposed by anyone as to why the lies, etc. As with everything else, use at your own risk.