On 10/12/14, coderman <coderman@gmail.com> wrote:
... also, the definitive paper at http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/tls/ still insists, "For WPA/TKIP, the only reasonable countermeasure is to upgrade to WPA2." which is either incompetently incorrect, or intentional indirection.
there is a third option: innocently overlooked. it is unreasonable of me to assume that lack of prompt corrections is intentional, as the research is older and not recently updated. it is unreasonable of me to assume that the lack of awareness regarding TKIP in WPA2 is widely known, as only driver implementations and packet disassemblers appear to act on these optional elements. it is unreasonable of me to repay actual research implementing attacks with criticism lamenting better information and guidance on a subset of the research. in sum: my assumptions of motive were incorrect, rude, and demand retraction. best regards, one libelous jerk