________________________________ From: Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn@rushpost.com> To: cypherpunks@cpunks.org Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 5:27 PM Subject: Re: patents in a free society (Re: Brother can you help a fiber?) On Fri, Nov 8, 2013, at 07:38 PM, Bill Stewart wrote:
Some of us strongly believe in intellectual property. Some of us believe that initiating force to defend "imaginary property" that's really a euphemism for a government-granted monopoly is both dishonest and anathema.
I agree with the concepts of copyrights, patents (for physical inventions only), trademarks, trade dress, and trade secrets. I disagree completely with the use of the term "intellectual property" because the laws governing copyrights, patents, trademarks, trade dress, and trade secrets are not property laws. Not only is the term "intellectual property" deceptive, misleading, and ambiguous, the people who brought it to us are the same ones who would love to shut down BitTorrent and similar information sharing technologies. Shawn K. Quinn > skquinn@rushpost.com
Can we all agree that if a 'patent system' were implemented by 'voluntary-ist' methods, that doesn't involve government-initiated force, that would solve the problem: Those that agreed with copyrights/patents would buy only from stores that specialize in copyright/patent-honoring products/manufacturers; others would buy from all stores, including those that sold non-copyright/patent-honoring products. Jim Bell