Re: [ot][spam][crazy] simplest logic

anyway! here's an example table: I O 0 1 1 1 in this example table, the resulting state is usually noncorrelated with the preceding state. it is usually just true, apparently on its own. but maybe not always! here's another: I O 0 1 1 0 here, the preceding state is inversely correlated with the following. but maybe not always! and here: I O 0 0 1 1 the preceding state determines the following. interesting examples!