I'd be really, really impressed if this was really a stego tool's output. Is it really possible to build systems that can generate mostly-but-not-entirely grammatically correct sentences about a specific topic with meaningful progression between subtopics? On Sun, 2013-09-29 at 20:50 -0500, brian carroll wrote:
5:55 PM, coderman <coderman@gmail.com> wrote:
... the authoritarians hang out on cryptography@metzdowd.com
yeah- heard it through the wire its a rough crowd over there...
not worth being stabbed by a ham while walking down the street
also, best to avoid the pyre if at all possible, re: fool/fuel use
has me wondering about the two crypto lists in conjunction,
if a census has been conducted or online survey for background
in that, seemingly there are two or three main areas i am guessing
for crypto backgrounds-- those from the military, those from academia,
mathematics and-or linguistics, & those from computers/webdev
for instance, percentage of ham operators in given age ranges
how many had a parent with electronics or engineering background
how many approached via software development online or pre-internet
it would be interesting to know how the list populations are different
e.g. perhaps older, military trained crypto at the cryptography-list
more computer-based, software development crypto at cypherpunks
also in this same regard; how many learned electronics during era
of crystal radio building etc. or other DIY independent exploration or
homebrew computing or are now involved in microcontrollers today, etc.
and in this same way it would be interesting if more projects/classes/
education could occur for electromagnetic literacy in electronics today
as a foundation for both knowledge and skills yet also experimentation,
prototyping, new code, programming, proof-of-concept crypto systems
that move from ideas into hardware and software models, vice-versa
-- Sent from Ubuntu