corp will take the fall for the leak. The leak is out there, but the corp dies of negligience or something, rather than from a stand up principled fight. That's not a win.
"Halt and catch fire" is a pretty good defense, I think. It's why Lavabit shut down, after all; it is *better* to crash and burn than become a cog of oppression. On 01/06/14 06:03, grarpamp wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 2:53 PM, jim bell <jamesdbell9@yahoo.com> wrote:
https://www.google.com/#q=corporation+cannot+conspire+with+itself deliver a copy of that NSL letter to each of its employees Obviously, that news will leak. Prosecution of any specific corporate employee will be difficult without very detailed evidence.
As in the search results... whoever was leaking employee is irrelevant, the employee is the corp. If an employee cannot be found *and* successfully treated separately from the corp, the corp will take the fall for the leak. The leak is out there, but the corp dies of negligience or something, rather than from a stand up principled fight. That's not a win.
The issue will arise: Can a corporation legally deliver a copy of that NSL to each employee?
Probably depends on how the letter is worded / addressed. The default sense in absense of such restrictions would seem to be yes.
Find bitcoin accepting lawyer to do construction/opinion for cpunks list.
-- T: @onetruecathal, @IndieBBDNA P: +353876363185 W: http://indiebiotech.com