"The nuclear risk is obvious, though suppressed by the media across "the free world". The editorial writers of the Washington Post, having promoted the fiction of WMD in Iraq, demand that Obama attack Syria. Hillary Clinton, who publicly rejoiced at her executioner's role during the destruction of Libya, has repeatedly indicated that, as president, she will "go further" than Obama."
From here: http://johnpilger.com/articles/provoking-nuclear-war-by-media
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:18:32AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Who is most likely to start WW3? Trump is an unknown to some degree. Hillary is a certainty - her record is an absolute indictment.
Feel free to flip a coin though..
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 02:44:39PM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote:
dude, you anti-mericun troll, no?
not reading you much, but how comes you troll "HILLARY WAR!!!" and don't appear to troll the greedy crazy clown?
are anti-bitch prices higher and you must chose only one?
(expect trolling from Александр).
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 08:54:48PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Somewhat hyperbolic, so, is the message valid?
If Hillary Becomes President, Will We Have a Nuclear War? http://www.globalresearch.ca/trump-vs-hillary-if-hillary-gets-into-the-oval-... (Alt: http://russia-insider.com/en/if-hillary-gets-oval-office-will-we-have-nuclea... )