On 12/12/21, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:16:03 -0500 Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:
i went back to this a little bit.
jim bell was abused by surveillance-by-government.
And now he's a government surveillance propagandist.
it would be silly to think he supported it.
he supports it NOW.
i vaguely recall he may have invented the concept of sousveillance, where a surveillance subject records abuse by surveillance, possibly to prove it happened.
it seems like you are lying here?
It seems you can't tell apart past and present? Or else yes, YOU are flatly lying, which is pretty dumb, because like I said, the evidence of bell's support for government surveillance is clear.
The garbage he just spammed about poor oppressed bears is the latest example.
His constant starlink vomits are just another example.
i mean, this does happen, people become government shills after their government destroys their life and enslaves them, but on reading another thread here i think jim bell distinguishes between corps and governments. yeah corp surveillance is crummy too though. i don't really understand the practical difference. different available approaches for influencing things, i'm thinking.