On Jun 23, 2016 3:42 PM, "juan" <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
Cecilia said 'moderation' (that is censorship) was almost always
bad, but sometimes 'justified'(or something like that).
Given the 'context' and as far as I'm concerned, Cecilia was
saying that banning all the people that tor-fascists banned was 'justified' 'ok' or whatever. Hey, I did not say it at all, hard headed Juan! :P But it is their list and their rules, being unjust or not. If they want to censor their list in a dishonest and stupid way, using bad excuses, they will lose credibility, respect and collaborators. Their problems, not mine.
By the way, Cecilia's 'argument' is pretty much self-defeating.
If censorship is OK 'sometimes', then she can't complain about being censored 'sometimes', like 'this' time. Sorry, I wanted to read the list and don't care about following rules to do it, if necessary. Social rules, for example: - In the Summer, I really prefer to be nude all the time, but I use clothes or I will be arrested. :-/ Reading the tor-talk list is not possible because my personal positions are different? Ok, what could I wait of a guy who can't simply admiss that was stupid, limited and cruel for calling a raped woman, a "ludicrous rape apologetics". I know it is a terrible bad karma, but I would love to graffitti these exact words in his house. So Boyce would be able to understand how heavy and offensive were his words.