I asked to Roger about the tor-talk moderation rules weeks ago and did not receive any answer. I can send the message in private to you, if you don't believe.

** I was already raped twice and I do have deep physical and emotional scars. Do you really think I loved my experiences and I deserve to be called "ludicrous rape apologetics"? **

I was talking about truth and lies, about judgements without proofs. I was a real victim in the past, I didn't tell lies. I know in my own burned skin what is being a victim of rape. Please, you can offend my intelligence, but it is really injust and pretty sick to call me "rape apologetics".

I bet you will leave ja.group post lies in tor-talk list, Boyce. How about being *fair*, please? I can create a fake account just for reading tor-talk list, but I prefer to use my own name and be transparent, expose myself when talking about lies. So, the ja.group or any person can contact me if they really want to talk about the truth.

On Jun 22, 2016 6:03 PM, "Griffin Boyce" <griffin@cryptolab.net> wrote:

Cecilia Tanaka wrote:

Boyce, please, just pro-Jake people were banned or it was just a
lovely coincidence? How about a bit of transparency, please?

Hello Cecilia,

This is the relevant thread on tor-project: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/2016-June/000459.html

As you can see, the emphasis is on off-topic posts and not the members' personal beliefs. Though having my inbox overrun with more than 300 messages filled with the most ludicrous rape apologetics was certainly a factor in my decision to ask for the ability to remove subscribers.

juan wrote:

> I'm obviously re-subscribing right now. The fuck is wrong
> with you.

You're banned. Go elsewhere.

so you work for the department of defense, eh shitbag? Too
stupid and coward to even admit it =)

Senpai isn't going to notice you bro.