Dāvis Mosāns wrote:
GamerGate is not about that, you've read too much into some
propaganda. I know only single such case about 1 game. And I haven't
seen any harassers admitting that they do it for GamerGate or
journalism, but IMO they're just trolls who like to use this
opportunity. They like publicity (even if it's bad) and that's what
they're getting. I'm not sure if you can imagine this mindset, but I
can't deny that it must be exciting to read news story about death
threats you wrote. It actually encourages to do it again. There's well
know internet Rule 14 "Do not argue with trolls — it means that they
win." so as usual - Don't feed the trolls.
First of all, it is never *ever* someone's fault when random internet creeps stalk and harass them. If continuing to have an opinion and be in an industry is "feeding the trolls" then you should seriously consider changing your views on the subject.
By Newsweek's count, Brianna Wu and Anita Sarkeesian got nearly 80'000 twitter comments in response to their views on GamerGate itself. Eighty thousand -- that's more than all journalists and news outlets combined (including Kotaku). Tell me this isn't about the ongoing harassment of women who have an opinion. I don't watch AS's videos and find her conclusions to be quite thin at times. Doesn't matter -- she has the fundamental right to voice an opinion.
And if you don't want to be associated with abject harassment, then don't hitch your wagon to a cause that harasses people. Form a group of sane people and pick a different hashtag. I have literally *no* sympathy for sane people who aren't willing to use a different hashtag. They're sacrificing integrity in order to ride a wave of abjectly shitty publicity.